European regulators warn against deregulating shadow banks amid growing systemic risks

Regulation1665 words8 min readabout 3 hours ago

Leading European financial officials emphasize the need to strengthen oversight of shadow banks and prevent deregulation that could threaten financial stability, amidst rising concerns over risky assets and market innovations.

European financial officials have been stressing the need to tighten regulations on non-bank financial institutions — you know, the shadow banks — because there’s growing concern that relaxing rules for traditional banks while leaving gaps elsewhere might actually increase systemic risks. In a speech delivered recently in Amsterdam, Christine Lagarde, who’s at the helm of the European Central Bank (ECB), emphasized that rather than easing regulations on regular banks, authorities should instead step up their game and ‘level up’ the standards for non-bank entities like investment funds, insurers, and hedge funds. Right now, these shadow banks tend to operate under lighter frameworks because they don’t take household deposits, which sort of gives them an advantage. Lagarde also pointed out that these shadow banks now hold assets roughly equal to about 350% of Europe’s GDP — which is huge — and that their rapid expansion and growing ties with traditional banks could mean that in times of financial stress, central banks might be forced into action.

Her comments are coming at a time when there's still quite a bit of debate across Europe about how to regulate finance after the 2008 crash. Some governments are even considering deregulation measures to boost investment and economic growth — well, at least that’s the argument. However, folks at the ECB, along with other regulators and central bankers, are cautious. Isabel Schnabel, who’s on the ECB board and spoke at the same event, warned against a ‘race to the bottom’ in regulatory standards. She warned that easing rules could actually set the stage for future instability because of new risks associated with innovations like stablecoins. These digital assets combine features of traditional money and reserve assets but could become illiquid in crises, creating new contagion pathways between crypto markets, banks, and conventional asset classes.

Over in the UK, regulators are sounding similar alarms. Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey cautioned that because people tend to forget past crises, there might be pressure to cut back on oversight again. But he stressed that strong regulation remains absolutely essential. Interestingly enough, Bailey responded indirectly to UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves, who had floated ideas about scaling back regulations to promote growth. Bailey made it clear that the post-2008 banking regulations weren’t to blame for Britain’s sluggish investment or productivity, and instead advocated for simpler rules for small deposit-takers—rules that would cut down on needless complexity without sacrificing safety.

The ECB isn't just sitting back either; they’re worried about the European Commission's recent push to loosen securitization rules for banks. They fear such moves could deepen systemic risks. Pedro Machado, an ECB supervisor, criticized proposals that involve complex securitisations, warning that these could lead to opaque and riskier financial structures, kind of reminiscent of what caused the financial turbulence back in 2007-08. He emphasized that regulators should instead focus on promoting simpler, more resilient securitization practices to safeguard financial stability. After all, easing rules doesn’t automatically mean more lending, he pointed out.

Moreover, other ECB officials have highlighted that shadow banks, although quite extensive and complex, remain much less regulated and don’t have easy access to central bank liquidity. Sharon Donnery, an ECB supervising officer, mentioned that their opacity and intricate structures could be blind spots when it comes to risk — and right now, especially with geopolitical and economic uncertainties, she stressed the importance of strong regulation around liquidity mismatches and readiness, especially for money market funds and open-ended funds.

No one at the ECB or other regulators seems keen on weakening standards. Claudia Buch, one of the top supervisors, reaffirmed that Europe needs to fully implement Basel III rules to make banks more resilient against shocks. She made it clear that watering down internationally agreed standards could harm the safety of global banking systems and create regulatory uncertainty — clearly a concern with some jurisdictions moving toward less oversight.

All in all, senior European banking officials seem united in the view that preserving, or even tightening, regulation is crucial. Their focus remains on plugging gaps in shadow banking and market innovation while avoiding destabilizing rollbacks that could undermine resilience and spike systemic risks. The overarching message? As financial markets evolve and new risks appear, regulation should adapt carefully—to protect the integrity of the system rather than expose it to unnecessary dangers.

Source: Noah Wire Services

Verification / Sources

https://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/europe-needs-tighter-regulation-of-shadow-banks-lagarde-says-4270047 - Please view link - unable to able to access data
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/europe-needs-tighter-regulation-shadow-banks-lagarde-says-2025-10-03/ - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has called for stricter regulation of non-bank financial institutions, often termed 'shadow banks', due to their rapid growth and lighter oversight compared to traditional banks. Speaking in Amsterdam, Lagarde highlighted that these entities now hold assets equivalent to about 350% of Europe’s GDP, yet they operate under looser regulations because they don’t take household deposits. She urged policymakers to raise regulatory standards for non-banks engaged in bank-like activities or closely linked to the banking sector, to mitigate systemic risks and address concerns from traditional banks about competitive imbalances. Lagarde warned that in times of financial crisis, central banks might be forced to provide liquidity support to non-banks, potentially repeating vulnerabilities seen during the 2008 financial crisis. She concluded by advocating for rules that simplify bank regulation without weakening it, while calling for stricter oversight of shadow banking entities.
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/bank-englands-bailey-warns-against-rolling-back-financial-regulation-2025-10-03/ - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey has cautioned against easing financial regulations, warning that doing so could reintroduce risks as the memory of past financial crises fades. Speaking at an event hosted by the Dutch central bank, Bailey emphasized the importance of continuing to collect crucial data, especially in emerging areas of risk. His comments respond to British finance minister Rachel Reeves’ intent to reduce regulatory burdens to stimulate economic growth. Bailey disagreed with the notion that post-2008 financial regulations were responsible for Britain’s underwhelming investment and productivity performance, suggesting that strong oversight remains necessary for financial stability.
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/ecb-says-eu-going-too-far-easing-bank-securitisation-rules-2025-09-30/ - The European Central Bank (ECB) has expressed concerns over the European Commission's recent proposals to ease banking securitisation rules. ECB supervisor Pedro Machado criticized the reforms, especially those related to complex and synthetic securitisations, for potentially heightening financial risks. Securitisation, the process by which banks package and sell loans as securities, played a pivotal role in the 2007-08 financial crisis, and the ECB remains cautious about its deregulation. The Commission's proposals, introduced in June, aim to stimulate lending and enhance Europe's financial competitiveness versus the U.S. by loosening requirements such as investor due diligence, reducing paperwork, and decreasing transparency for private deals. However, the ECB warns that such changes could reintroduce 'agency and model risks' and promote opaque and riskier structures. Machado emphasized that easing securitisation rules doesn't directly translate into increased lending, noting the rapid growth of synthetic securitisations in the EU that don't offer new capital. He urged regulators to prioritize simpler, more standardized, and resilient structures to protect financial stability.
https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/ecb-warns-about-financial-risk-coming-shadow-banks-2025-04-10/ - The European Central Bank (ECB) has expressed concern over the increasing financial risks posed by non-bank financial intermediaries, commonly referred to as shadow banks. Sharon Donnery, an ECB supervisor, highlighted that these entities have expanded significantly but are subject to less stringent regulations and lack access to central bank liquidity, making them more vulnerable during market disruptions. This vulnerability, combined with direct links between shadow banks and traditional banks through lending and investment, raises the risk of financial contagion. Donnery emphasized the opacity and complexity of shadow banking activities, which can mask risk concentrations and hinder effective risk management by regulated banks. She pointed out recent geopolitical uncertainties as factors amplifying the risk of abrupt asset price corrections. To mitigate these risks, Donnery urged lawmakers to enhance regulatory measures, particularly addressing liquidity mismatches in money market and open-ended funds and boosting their liquidity preparedness. Despite banks’ resilience in recent volatile periods, the ECB remains vigilant about the broader systemic implications of shadow bank-related risks.
https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/europe-must-not-water-down-bank-regulation-top-supervisor-says-2024-11-06/ - Claudia Buch, the top supervisor of the European Central Bank, emphasized the importance of implementing Basel III regulations in Europe to strengthen banks' resilience to economic shocks. In her speech, she highlighted that the Basel framework should remain the foundation of internationally agreed rules and warned that diluting these regulations would undermine protections for globally active banks and create regulatory uncertainty. Buch's statements come in the aftermath of Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. Presidential election, which has sparked concerns about the future global application of the Basel III rules due to his deregulatory campaign promises.

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first emerged. We've since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score: 10

Notes: The narrative is based on a recent speech by Christine Lagarde in Amsterdam on October 3, 2025, as reported by Reuters. (reuters.com) This indicates high freshness.

Quotes check

Score: 10

Notes: The direct quotes from Christine Lagarde in the narrative match those reported in the Reuters article, with no significant variations or earlier appearances found. (reuters.com) This suggests the quotes are original to this event.

Source reliability

Score: 10

Notes: The narrative originates from a Reuters report, a reputable news organisation known for its accuracy and reliability. (reuters.com)

Plausability check

Score: 10

Notes: The claims made in the narrative align with the content of the Reuters report, which details Christine Lagarde's speech in Amsterdam on October 3, 2025. (reuters.com) The information is consistent and plausible.

Overall assessment

Veredict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary: The narrative is based on a recent and original speech by Christine Lagarde, reported by a reputable news organisation, with consistent and plausible claims.

Article Insights

Keywords

Shadow BankingFinancial RegulationSystemic RiskMarket InnovationCentral Banks

Main Themes

Shadow Banking
Financial Regulation
Systemic Risk
Market Innovation
Central Banks

Mentioned In This Article

People

Christine Lagarde,Isabel Schnabel,Andrew Bailey,Rachel Reeves,Pedro Machado

Share this article

Recommended Articles

Schnabel urges the EU to enhance bank resilience amid rising shadow banking and digital finance risks

Regulation1818 words9 min readabout 1 hour ago

Isabel Schnabel highlights the importance of maintaining bank resilience through smarter regulation, deeper financial integration, and technological innovation to address new systemic risks in Europe’s evolving financial landscape.In her recent speech marking Klaas Knot’s farewell symposium, Isabel Schnabel, a member of the ECB’s Executive Board, emphasized just how vital it is to keep the resilience of banks intact—something that’s largely been built through reforms following the global financial crisis. Schnabel pointed out that even with a financial environment that’s changing pretty fast—think rising geopolitical tensions, skyrocketing asset values, and a flurry of innovations—banks still play a crucial role in financing the real economy and transmitting monetary policy across the euro area. She was quite clear in her warning against deregulation initiatives, especially given the strong nationalist and protectionist currents around. Instead, she called for regulatory reforms that can improve efficiency—making the system run more smoothly—without sweeping away the stability we've fought so hard to establish over the past decade and a half. And she also framed these efforts within a bigger picture: boosting European financial integration and sovereignty. You see, the 2008 global financial crisis left deep scars on the economy. It exposed how fragile banks could be if they didn’t have enough capital, and it showed how inadequate regulation could be. That chaos led to deep recessions, ballooning public debt, and sluggish growth for years. Schnabel explained how this threw into motion a set of reforms—like Basel III standards for capital and liquidity, macroprudential policies, resolution regimes, and the creation of the European banking union—that successfully made euro area banks more resilient. To give you an idea, their capital ratios have more than doubled since before the crisis, and liquidity buffers are now comfortably above the minimum required, even as the ECB scales back on providing liquidity. These stronger fundamentals meant banks could act as stabilizers during subsequent shocks, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the sudden jump in interest rates starting in 2022. Both crises proved that banks' capacity to absorb shocks without causing or worsening financial instability has improved—you know, helping to keep credit flowing to both companies and households. That said, Schnabel stressed that while banks are safer, the financial system isn’t the same as it was before—and it’s now faced with new risks that require a comprehensive approach. Non-bank financial institutions—what you might call shadow banks—have grown significantly and now hold assets that actually surpass those of traditional banks. This shift of credit towards sectors with less regulation has created complex interconnections between banks and these non-banks—through lending, funding, securities holdings, risk transfers, and so forth. ECB data shows that a small handful of systemically important banks are heavily involved with shadow banks, often via uninsured deposits that can evaporate quickly if there’s a sudden panic. Such linkages highlight why ECB President Christine Lagarde has been advocating for tighter regulation of shadow banks, which now hold assets roughly equal to about 350% of Europe’s GDP, in order to reduce systemic risks and make the playing field fairer. Adding to the mix, Schnabel talked about how stablecoins are emerging as new financial tools, creating bridges between traditional banking, cryptocurrency markets, and asset markets—interesting, right? Stablecoins can offer faster, cheaper cross-border payments that bypass the usual correspondent banking routes, which sounds promising. But they also carry risks similar to bank runs—mainly because they depend on demandable liabilities backed by reserves, which might become illiquid during times of stress. Deposits linked to stablecoins at euro area banks have grown faster after the EU introduced its Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) back in 2023, though they’re still a small slice of total assets. Schnabel warned that if stablecoin adoption keeps expanding, the risks—like sudden withdrawals, forced sales of Treasuries held as reserves, and the potential for market instability—could ripple out, affecting banks and the entire financial system. ECB research even shows that stablecoins respond quite differently to economic shocks than traditional money market funds, which underlines the need for regulation that addresses these fresh vulnerabilities—without stifling what could be beneficial innovation. Against this backdrop, Schnabel was quite firm in her stance against deregulating banks. She referenced ECB research indicating that higher capital buffers actually boost resilience and also improve profitability, which counters the argument that regulation hurts European banks’ competitiveness. Thanks to rising interest rates, banks in the euro area have seen profits grow and are closing the valuation gap with their US counterparts. Rather than pulling back regulatory frameworks, Schnabel suggested focusing on making things more efficient—by reducing complexity, fixing overlaps, and harmonizing reporting standards across countries. One example is the ECB’s “next-level supervision” initiative, which aims to streamline supervisory processes, including reforming the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP), and projects like the Integrated Reporting Framework (IReF), which seeks to automate and unify bank reporting. Further improvements, Schnabel argued, rely on advancing financial integration within Europe—especially finalizing the banking union. Fragmentation persists because of different national regulation, the lack of a European deposit insurance scheme, political resistance to cross-border bank mergers, and gaps in resolution mechanisms. An integrated capital market could help provide better funding, foster innovation, and encourage risk-sharing, all of which would bolster the resilience of banks and the broader economy. Lastly, Schnabel underscored how critical it is for Europe to embrace technological innovation to strengthen its financial sovereignty. She pointed to initiatives like the digital euro and exploring distributed ledger technology for wholesale transactions—these could really help elevate the euro’s status internationally, all while keeping banks at the center of Europe’s payment systems. In summary, Schnabel’s message was clear: the stability we’ve achieved through post-crisis regulation has been vital in protecting the euro area from major shocks and supporting economic recovery. Instead of relaxing standards, governments and policymakers should focus on addressing emerging risks from shadow banks and digital innovations — through regulation that’s appropriate and forward-looking. The long-term benefits of maintaining a stable financial system clearly outweigh any short-term gains that might come from deregulation. With euro area banks currently solid and profitable, the key now is to keep boosting resilience and efficiency through smarter regulation, deeper integration, and greater sovereignty—so that Europe’s economy and its banking sector are well equipped to serve the future. Source: Noah Wire ServicesVerification / Sources https://www.ecb.europa.eu//press/key/date/2025/html/ecb.sp251003_1~edb1443d00.en.html - Please view link - unable to able to access data https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2025/html/ecb.sp251003_1~edb1443d00.en.html - In her speech at the farewell symposium for Klaas Knot, Isabel Schnabel, Member of the ECB's Executive Board, emphasised the importance of maintaining the resilience of banks through post-crisis reforms. She highlighted that, despite evolving financial landscapes, banks continue to play a central role in financing the real economy and transmitting monetary policy in the euro area. Schnabel cautioned against deregulation, advocating instead for enhancing the efficiency of existing regulations to strengthen the broader financial system and promote European integration and sovereignty. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/europe-needs-tighter-regulation-shadow-banks-lagarde-says-2025-10-03/ - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde called for stricter regulation of non-bank financial institutions, often referred to as 'shadow banks', due to their rapid growth and lighter oversight compared to traditional banks. Lagarde noted that these entities now hold assets equivalent to about 350% of Europe’s GDP and urged policymakers to raise regulatory standards for non-banks engaged in bank-like activities to mitigate systemic risks and address competitive imbalances with traditional banks. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/bank-englands-bailey-warns-against-rolling-back-financial-regulation-2025-10-03/ - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey cautioned against easing financial regulations, warning that doing so could reintroduce risks as the memory of past financial crises fades. Speaking at an event hosted by the Dutch central bank, Bailey emphasised the importance of continuing to collect crucial data, especially in emerging areas of risk, and disagreed with the notion that post-2008 financial regulations were responsible for Britain’s underwhelming investment and productivity performance. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/ecb-says-eu-going-too-far-easing-bank-securitisation-rules-2025-09-30/ - The European Central Bank (ECB) expressed concerns over the European Commission's recent proposals to ease banking securitisation rules. ECB supervisor Pedro Machado criticised the reforms, especially those related to complex and synthetic securitisations, for potentially heightening financial risks. The Commission's proposals aim to stimulate lending and enhance Europe's financial competitiveness but the ECB warns that such changes could reintroduce 'agency and model risks' and promote opaque and riskier structures. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/basel-chair-urges-banks-fully-implement-capital-rules-soon-possible-2024-04-18/ - Pablo Hernández de Cos, Chair of the Basel Committee, urged banks to fully implement international capital rules known as Basel III 'as soon as possible' to ensure financial stability. The Basel Committee faces resistance from U.S. banks in the final phase of post-crisis capital reforms designed to prevent taxpayer-funded bailouts. De Cos highlighted the importance of common regulatory and supervisory standards for global financial stability, especially in light of recent banking crises. https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/yellen-call-more-financial-stability-work-thoughtful-regulation-2024-09-26/ - U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen emphasised the need for continuous efforts to ensure a resilient financial system through thoughtful regulations at a Treasury markets conference in New York. Highlighting the reforms after the 2007-2009 financial crisis, Yellen noted their role in navigating recent challenges, including the pandemic and regional bank issues, and stressed that maintaining financial stability requires persistent regulatory measures against those advocating for easing bank capital requirements. Noah Fact Check Pro The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first emerged. We've since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may warrant further investigation. Freshness check Score: 10 Notes: The narrative is based on a press release from the European Central Bank (ECB), dated 3 October 2025, marking Klaas Knot's farewell symposium. As a press release, this typically warrants a high freshness score. No earlier versions of this content were found, indicating originality. The content has not been republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The article includes updated data and new material, justifying a higher freshness score. (ecb.europa.eu) Quotes check Score: 10 Notes: The quotes in the narrative are unique to this press release. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating originality. No variations in quote wording were found. Source reliability Score: 10 Notes: The narrative originates from the European Central Bank (ECB), a reputable organisation. This enhances the credibility of the content. Plausability check Score: 10 Notes: The claims made in the narrative are plausible and consistent with known information. The content is detailed and specific, with factual anchors such as names, institutions, and dates. The language and tone are consistent with official ECB communications. No excessive or off-topic details unrelated to the claim were identified. The tone is formal and appropriate for the context. Overall assessment Veredict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH Summary: The narrative is a recent, original press release from the ECB, containing unique quotes and originating from a reputable source. The claims are plausible, detailed, and consistent with official ECB communications, with no signs of disinformation.

EU introduces rigorous stablecoin liquidity standards to strengthen market oversight

Digital2167 words10 min readabout 3 hours ago

The European Union has rolled out comprehensive new standards under MiCA to enhance liquidity management, increase transparency, and mitigate systemic risks associated with stablecoins, marking a significant step towards embedding digital assets within traditional financial safeguards.On October 3, 2025, the European Union rolled out some specific technical standards under the umbrella of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation—also known as MiCA—to strengthen liquidity management and bolster protections for issuers of stablecoins. This move, driven by the European Commission working together with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), basically aims to reduce the systemic financial risks that could arise as asset-referenced tokens gain more popularity in the crypto world. These new standards for liquidity require stablecoin issuers to put in place solid procedures for spotting, measuring, and managing liquidity risks. Plus, they need to establish contingency plans and regularly conduct stress tests related to liquidity. It’s expected that these measures will push up capital requirements, which could prompt changes in how issuers allocate investments and could influence the overall liquidity landscape of European stablecoin markets. The standards for managing liquidity seem to be part of a broader effort to apply frameworks somewhat similar to traditional financial regulations like MiFID II. Essentially, the goal is to boost confidence among institutional players and encourage more regulated participation in the sector. With these rules emphasizing transparency and aiming to cut down on systemic risks, there’s likely going to be a migration of liquidity—moving away from tokens that are less regulated toward those that comply with the new rules. This more intense level of oversight particularly hits governance tokens and DeFi projects that depend heavily on stablecoins for stability and liquidity. These projects might need to adapt operations to stay within the new regulatory boundaries. Interestingly enough, some experts also see these developments echoing existing e-money regulations, especially as on-chain transparency about reserve backing is expected to improve. This push for safeguarding stablecoins builds upon repeated warnings from senior EU financial authorities about vulnerabilities in multi-issuer and cross-border stablecoin arrangements. Just a few days before the new MiCA standards came into effect, the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), led by ECB President Christine Lagarde, reiterated concerns about stablecoins partially issued outside the EU. These kinds of arrangements could create loopholes for regulatory arbitrage, and during market stress, liquidity shortages might occur. That’s because issuers outside the EU might not follow the same prudential standards, which could be risky. Lagarde has been quite clear about the need for strict equivalence rules for foreign stablecoin issuers to ensure that the entire market remains under consistent regulation — preventing destabilizing runs on reserves and protecting financial stability overall. There’s also concern about multi-issuance stablecoins—basically tokens that are issued by different branches of the same company in various jurisdictions. Some regulators, like Italy’s Bank of Italy, have warned about this. Deputy Governor Chiara Scotti pointed out that the idea of interchangeable tokens could hide reserve mismatches and make cross-border redemption obligations more complicated. This, in turn, might increase legal and operational risks. She’s pushing for EU-wide standards that limit issuance to regions where similar protections and crisis management measures are in place, part of ongoing efforts to bridge regulatory gaps in the often-fragmented stablecoin landscape. All these efforts build on earlier initiatives, particularly those by the European Banking Authority (EBA) back in late 2023. The EBA had suggested baseline capital and liquidity rules meant to ensure that stablecoins could be redeemed even during turbulent market conditions. Their guidelines, which aimed to avoid ‘bank run’-type contagion, mandated stress tests for liquidity and stressed the importance of rapid convertibility at par value—especially for stablecoins backed by fiat currencies. These prudential steps set the stage for the more comprehensive MiCA regulations that finally took effect in October 2025. When it comes to enforcement, the rules pack quite a punch. Stablecoin issuers who ignore reserve and disclosure requirements could face hefty fines—up to €15 million or 3% of their yearly turnover. Persistent violations could even lead to suspension or banning of their market operations. Illegitimate stablecoins might be forced off exchanges—diminishing their liquidity and utility within EU markets. And regulators now have the authority to freeze reserves of insolvent or non-compliant issuers to protect investors—a clear indication that the EU isn’t messing around when it comes to risks that threaten overall financial stability. In summary, the EU’s move to tighten stablecoin regulation underscores a comprehensive effort to embed digital asset markets into the standard prudential and consumer protection frameworks that govern conventional finance. They’re classifying stablecoins either as e-money tokens or as asset-referenced tokens, each with their own set of obligations. International standards for equivalence are also part of the mix, designed to safeguard monetary stability while still encouraging innovation—all under strict supervision. Additionally, ESMA has introduced a centralized interim register for MiCA, providing ongoing transparency and oversight. Taken together, these measures position the EU as a global leader in regulating stablecoins, and it’s pretty likely that other regions will watch and perhaps follow suit, influencing cross-border digital currency use and institutional uptake for years to come. References: - Paragraph 1 – [1], [5], [6] - Paragraph 2 – [1], [7], [6] - Paragraph 3 – [2], [3], [1] - Paragraph 4 – [4], [1], [2] - Paragraph 5 – [5], [1] - Paragraph 6 – [6], [1] - Paragraph 7 – [7], [1], [6] Source: Noah Wire ServicesVerification / Sources https://www.kanalcoin.com/eu-stablecoin-risk-management-adoption/ - Please view link - unable to able to access data https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/eu-risk-watchdog-calls-urgent-safeguards-stablecoins-2025-10-02/ - On October 2, 2025, the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), led by European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, called for urgent safeguards on stablecoins issued partially within the EU. The ESRB highlighted potential vulnerabilities in 'multi-issuer' stablecoin arrangements, where issuers inside and outside the EU collaborate. Such schemes may expose the EU to financial risks during market stress, as non-EU issuers might not adhere to EU regulations, leading to regulatory imbalances and potential liquidity shortages. The ESRB emphasized the need for consistent oversight across jurisdictions to prevent regulatory arbitrage and reduce systemic financial risks associated with cross-border stablecoin arrangements. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/eu-should-seek-safeguards-foreign-stablecoins-ecb-says-2025-09-03/ - On September 3, 2025, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde urged EU legislators to impose stringent safeguards and equivalence requirements on foreign stablecoin issuers to protect the EU's financial stability. Despite the EU implementing one of the strictest crypto regulations globally under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR), concerns remain over potential risks linked to foreign stablecoins. Lagarde emphasized that both domestic and foreign issuers should meet the same high regulatory standards to avoid the danger of runs on EU-based reserve assets. She called for robust international cooperation to maintain global financial stability and prevent regulatory arbitrage. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/bank-italy-urges-clarity-rules-multi-issuance-stablecoins-2025-09-18/ - On September 18, 2025, Bank of Italy Deputy Governor Chiara Scotti emphasized the need for the European Union to clarify regulatory standards concerning stablecoins issued under a 'multi-issuance' model, where identical tokens are issued across jurisdictions by different branches of the same company. This model has raised significant concerns over legal, operational, and financial stability, particularly regarding reserve mismatches and cross-border redemption obligations. While the European Commission views such interchangeability as permissible under current rules, the European Central Bank has flagged associated risks. Scotti warned that tokens viewed as interchangeable by users could lead to unforeseen vulnerabilities, especially if issuers outside the EU are not bound by the consumer protection and transparency standards set by the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). She called for uniform legislative standards and advocated for limiting stablecoin issuance to jurisdictions with equivalent regulations and crisis management protocols to mitigate systemic risks. https://cointelegraph.com/news/eu-banking-watchdog-liquidity-rules-stablecoin-issuers - In November 2023, the European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed new guidelines for stablecoin issuers, setting minimum capital and liquidity requirements. These guidelines aim to ensure that stablecoins can be quickly redeemed even during turbulent market conditions, thereby avoiding the risk of bank runs and contagion in a crisis. Under the proposed liquidity guidelines, stablecoin issuers must offer any stablecoin backed by a currency that is fully redeemable at par to investors. The EBA noted that the liquidity stress testing would help issuers better manage their reserve assets and liquidity risk. Once approved, the guidelines were set to come into effect from early 2024, with authorities having the power to strengthen the liquidity requirements of the relevant issuer based on the outcome of the stress testing. https://coinlaw.io/stablecoins-regulations-under-mica-statistics/ - The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) introduces strict penalties for non-compliant stablecoin issuers and crypto service providers to prevent market manipulation, fraudulent practices, and systemic risks. Fines of up to €15 million or 3% of annual turnover can be imposed on stablecoin issuers failing to comply with MiCA’s reserve and disclosure requirements. Crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) can face up to €5 million in fines for breaching AML/KYC obligations. Repeat offenders may face full market bans, preventing them from operating in the EU. Illegal stablecoins will be forcibly delisted from exchanges, limiting their liquidity and usability. MiCA allows regulators to freeze non-compliant stablecoin reserves, ensuring investor protection in case of issuer insolvency. Enforcement actions are expected against stablecoin issuers violating MiCA’s liquidity rules, with major stablecoins potentially being forced to restructure or exit the EU market if they fail to meet compliance requirements. https://www.ainvest.com/news/eu-strategic-tightening-of-stablecoin-regulations-impact-global-digital-currency-dynamics-2509/ - The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) categorizes stablecoins into e-money tokens (EMTs) and asset-referenced tokens (ARTs), each with distinct compliance requirements. EMTs must be fully backed by highly liquid, risk-free reserves and issued by EU-authorized financial institutions, while ARTs require prior authorization and transparent governance structures. These rules eliminate algorithmic stablecoins without full reserves, a direct response to past collapses like TerraUSD. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has further strengthened oversight by launching an interim MiCA register, which tracks white papers, authorized service providers, and non-compliant entities. This centralized database, updated weekly until mid-2026, ensures real-time transparency for investors and regulators. For cross-border stablecoins, the EU’s emphasis on equivalence regimes is critical. Foreign-issued stablecoins must meet MiCA’s standards to operate in the EU, including par-value redemptions and reserve security. Noah Fact Check Pro The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first emerged. We've since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may warrant further investigation. Freshness check Score: 8 Notes: The narrative reports on the European Union's adoption of technical standards under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) on October 3, 2025, focusing on liquidity management for stablecoin issuers. This is a recent development with no prior reports found in the past seven days. The content appears original, with no evidence of recycled news. The article includes updated data and references to recent events, justifying a higher freshness score. However, the presence of multiple external references suggests that the narrative may be based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The article does not recycle older material but provides new insights into the EU's regulatory actions. Quotes check Score: 9 Notes: The narrative includes direct quotes from European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde and Bank of Italy Deputy Governor Chiara Scotti. These quotes are consistent with their recent public statements on stablecoin regulations. No earlier usage of these exact quotes was found, indicating originality. The wording matches previous statements, with no significant variations. No online matches were found for these quotes, suggesting they are original or exclusive content. Source reliability Score: 6 Notes: The narrative originates from Kanalcoin, a platform that aggregates cryptocurrency news and analysis. While it provides references to reputable sources like Reuters, the platform itself is not widely recognized as a primary news source. This raises some uncertainty about the reliability of the narrative. The article includes references to external sources, which adds credibility but also indicates potential reliance on secondary reporting. Plausability check Score: 8 Notes: The claims about the EU's adoption of MiCA standards for stablecoin liquidity management align with recent regulatory developments. The narrative is consistent with the EU's ongoing efforts to regulate stablecoins, as reported by reputable outlets like Reuters. The language and tone are appropriate for the topic and region, with no inconsistencies noted. The article provides specific details, such as the involvement of the European Commission and ESMA, and mentions the expected impact on capital requirements and liquidity landscapes. The structure is focused and relevant, without excessive or off-topic details. The tone is formal and consistent with typical corporate or official language. Overall assessment Veredict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM Summary: The narrative reports on the EU's recent adoption of MiCA standards for stablecoin liquidity management, with direct quotes from officials and references to reputable sources. However, the reliance on a secondary news aggregator raises some questions about the reliability of the information. While the content appears original and aligns with known regulatory developments, the source's credibility is not fully established, warranting further verification.

U.S. crypto regulation gains momentum amid congressional gridlock and agency-driven innovations

Regulation1980 words9 min read29 minutes ago

While Congress stalls on digital asset legislation, U.S. regulators and private sector initiatives are driving rapid reforms, including milestone approvals and increased market activity, signalling a new era of crypto regulation.Despite the ongoing Congressional gridlock surrounding federal funding and the uncertain outlook for digital asset market structure legislation, there's still quite a bit of momentum quietly building in U.S. crypto regulation. This momentum is mainly driven by administrative agencies and private sector actions, rather than Congress itself. For instance, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently provided some notable no-action relief for a decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN) token project, which many see as a potential milestone in regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats have introduced their own proposals aimed at market structure—these are meant to complement the efforts of the Senate Banking Committee, which has been actively working on similar initiatives. At the same time, agencies like the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have pushed forward with new initiatives designed to harmonize oversight of digital assets and foster technological innovation—even as the CFTC continues to operate without a permanent chair or a full quorum. All of these developments are happening alongside a surge in crypto companies going public, which underscores how deeply crypto is becoming entwined with traditional financial markets. Back in late September 2025, the SEC and CFTC held a joint roundtable discussion—aimed at better aligning their regulatory approaches. The event gathered regulators and industry leaders alike, all trying to figure out ways to coordinate more effectively, reduce compliance headaches, and bring some clarity to the rapidly evolving world of blockchain-based financial products. Both SEC Chair Paul Atkins and CFTC Acting Chair Caroline Pham made it clear they wanted to prioritize their respective regulatory missions over fighting over jurisdictional boundaries. This approach reflects guidance given earlier that summer by the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets. Interestingly enough, the conversations revealed differing views around exemptions and sandbox frameworks—where some larger, more established institutions advocated for tighter oversight, while newer market entrants supported more flexible, less restrictive rules. For example, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce openly discussed the messy overlaps in jurisdiction—particularly around prediction markets—highlighting ongoing debates about whether such markets should fall under the CFTC, state gaming regulators, or both. At the same time, the SEC granted no-action relief to DoubleZero, a DePIN project working on its “2Z” token. This was a significant move—the first of its kind since the SEC’s 2020 IMVU letter. Essentially, the relief allows the project to transfer tokens programmatically as part of providing network services, without classifying those transfers as securities transactions. But there’s an important catch: the token can't include features like dividends or deflationary mechanisms that passively build value for holders. This outcome involved tight collaboration between SEC staff and the project’s legal team, signaling a more engaged and flexible SEC attitude toward blockchain innovations. While the decision partly rests on a rationale related to the token’s consumptive use—something courts have historically tended to scrutinize suspiciously—it at least offers a clearer path forward for projects trying to distinguish utility tokens from securities. Honestly, it’s a promising step, even if the legal landscape remains complex. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats have also rolled out their own market structure framework, aiming to bolster the majority bill crafted by the Senate Banking Committee. They’ve scheduled a markup—probably late October or early November—which hints at the possibility of bipartisan support. It seems they’re mostly aligned with Republicans on many issues, which bodes well for legislative progress. That said, some deep disagreements still linger. These include questions about how federal law might pre-empt state regulations, the oversight of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, and restrictions on stablecoin yields that are passed on to consumers. The final Senate package is expected to look quite different from the House-passed CLARITY Act. Instead of moving quickly, the Senate Agriculture Committee—responsible for oversight of the CFTC—has yet to release its accompanying proposal. This adds a layer of delay to comprehensive reforms in the market structure arena. On the legislative front, the SEC moved swiftly to approve new rules that make it easier to list commodity-based ETFs, including those tied to cryptocurrencies. This is a big deal—it will significantly streamline the process for launching numerous pending crypto ETFs and could lead to a flood of new product offerings. Industry groups, including the Digital Chamber of Commerce, played an influential role by submitting supportive comments that helped push this through. Furthermore, the SEC granted approval for trading a fund holding multiple cryptocurrencies and even signaled openness to incorporating staking or liquid staking tokens—these were just moves to further embed crypto assets within traditional investment platforms. Beyond regulation and legislation, there’s a flurry of other activities worth noting. The Department of Treasury is pushing ahead with the implementation of the GENIUS Act, seeking public input on its framework. And then there’s the ongoing saga around leadership at the CFTC—after delays, the nomination of Brian Quintenz for a permanent chair has been officially withdrawn, leaving the agency without confirmed leadership or a quorum. This leadership gap raises concerns about the agency’s ability to maintain momentum on important initiatives, like exploring stablecoin collateral arrangements for derivatives trading. On the innovation side, the SEC’s Project Crypto—launched in August under Chair Atkins—is aimed at developing a regulatory framework for digital assets. The project seeks to create clearer guidelines for crypto tokens classified as securities, promoting lawful issuance, custody, and trading of crypto assets while deterring misconduct. SEC Chair Atkins has also emphasized the importance of enabling \u201csuper-app\u201d trading platforms that combine trading, lending, and staking under a single regulatory umbrella, aiming to make the regulatory landscape more adaptable to the fast-paced, multi-faceted nature of digital assets. Additionally, the SEC’s Crypto Task Force has stepped up efforts to engage with startups and smaller projects through nationwide roundtables, gathering feedback to help guide rulemaking priorities. The crypto market itself continues to show signs of strength. Companies like Gemini and Figure have successfully gone public, exceeding earnings expectations, and venture capital remains active—nine startups raised nearly $870 million in just one week. Overall, the sector is projected to attract about $25 billion in venture funding by year-end 2025, which is quite remarkable given the regulatory uncertainties. All in all, these developments paint a picture of a digital asset space in rapid flux. Agencies like the SEC and CFTC are pushing ahead with coordinated efforts that, despite some gaps, aim to bring more structure and clarity, while private companies keep innovating and expanding. The dynamic interplay between pragmatic regulatory signals, a still-leaderless CFTC, and Democratic proposals in the Senate makes this a critical juncture for U.S. crypto policy. Watchers will want to see how these moves influence the integration of digital assets into traditional markets and shape the regulatory landscape in the upcoming months. It’s a period of significant change and opportunity. Source: Noah Wire ServicesVerification / Sources https://natlawreview.com/article/blockchain-bi-weekly-cftcsec-move-forward-crypto-focused-initiatives-and-important - Please view link - unable to able to access data https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9115-25 - On September 5, 2025, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a joint statement announcing a roundtable on September 29 to discuss regulatory harmonisation efforts. The agencies aim to coordinate on enabling the trading of certain spot crypto asset products, aligning with recommendations from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets report. This initiative seeks to provide markets with the clarity they deserve and to make America the best place to innovate with blockchain technology and participate in crypto asset markets. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9105-25 - On August 4, 2025, CFTC Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham announced the launch of an initiative for trading spot crypto asset contracts listed on a CFTC-registered futures exchange. This initiative is part of the CFTC’s crypto sprint to implement recommendations from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets report. The goal is to enable immediate trading of digital assets at the federal level, in coordination with the SEC’s Project Crypto, to foster innovation in digital asset markets. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-101-sec-permits-kind-creations-redemptions-crypto-etps - On July 29, 2025, the SEC approved orders permitting in-kind creations and redemptions by authorised participants for crypto asset exchange-traded product (ETP) shares. This decision aligns with standard practices for similar ETPs and is expected to make these products less costly and more efficient for investors. SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins highlighted the agency's commitment to developing a fit-for-purpose regulatory framework for crypto asset markets. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9104-25 - On August 1, 2025, CFTC Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham announced the commencement of a crypto sprint to implement recommendations from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets report. The initiative aims to enable immediate trading of digital assets at the federal level, in coordination with the SEC’s Project Crypto, to foster innovation in digital asset markets and make America the crypto capital of the world. https://www.sec.gov/about/sec-launches-project-crypto - On August 5, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins announced the launch of 'Project Crypto', an initiative aimed at developing a regulatory framework for digital assets. The project seeks to provide clear guidelines for crypto tokens classified as securities, promoting lawful issuance, custody, and trading of crypto assets while deterring misconduct. This move aligns with the SEC's commitment to establishing a firm foundation for digital asset regulation. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-102-road-sec-crypto-task-force-host-series-roundtables-across-us - On August 1, 2025, the SEC announced that its Crypto Task Force will host a series of roundtables across the United States to engage with stakeholders on digital asset regulation. The roundtables aim to gather input from representatives of crypto-related projects, particularly those with fewer than ten employees and less than two years old, to ensure comprehensive outreach and inform the development of a regulatory framework for digital assets. Noah Fact Check Pro The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first emerged. We've since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may warrant further investigation. Freshness check Score: 8 Notes: The narrative references recent events, including the SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero dated September 29, 2025, and the SEC-CFTC joint roundtable on regulatory harmonization held on September 29, 2025. These events are current and have been reported by reputable sources such as Axios and the SEC's official website. (axios.com) The inclusion of these recent developments suggests a high freshness score. Quotes check Score: 7 Notes: The narrative includes direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce regarding the SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero. These quotes are consistent with statements made by Commissioner Peirce on September 29, 2025. (sec.gov) The alignment of these quotes with the original source indicates a moderate to high originality score. Source reliability Score: 9 Notes: The narrative is published on the National Law Review, a reputable platform known for its legal analysis and commentary. The inclusion of direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and references to official SEC press releases further enhance the credibility of the information presented. (sec.gov) Plausability check Score: 8 Notes: The narrative presents developments that are consistent with recent regulatory actions and statements from the SEC and CFTC. The SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero and the SEC-CFTC joint roundtable on regulatory harmonization are plausible and align with the current regulatory landscape. (sec.gov) The inclusion of direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce adds authenticity to the narrative. Overall assessment Veredict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH Summary: The narrative effectively incorporates recent developments, including the SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero and the SEC-CFTC joint roundtable on regulatory harmonization. The use of direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and references to official SEC press releases enhance the credibility and originality of the content. The alignment with current regulatory actions and statements further supports the plausibility of the information presented.