Poland’s new crypto law tightens regulations but risks stifling innovation

While Congress stalls on digital asset legislation, U.S. regulators and private sector initiatives are driving rapid reforms, including milestone approvals and increased market activity, signalling a new era of crypto regulation.Despite the ongoing Congressional gridlock surrounding federal funding and the uncertain outlook for digital asset market structure legislation, there's still quite a bit of momentum quietly building in U.S. crypto regulation. This momentum is mainly driven by administrative agencies and private sector actions, rather than Congress itself. For instance, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently provided some notable no-action relief for a decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN) token project, which many see as a potential milestone in regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats have introduced their own proposals aimed at market structure—these are meant to complement the efforts of the Senate Banking Committee, which has been actively working on similar initiatives. At the same time, agencies like the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have pushed forward with new initiatives designed to harmonize oversight of digital assets and foster technological innovation—even as the CFTC continues to operate without a permanent chair or a full quorum. All of these developments are happening alongside a surge in crypto companies going public, which underscores how deeply crypto is becoming entwined with traditional financial markets. Back in late September 2025, the SEC and CFTC held a joint roundtable discussion—aimed at better aligning their regulatory approaches. The event gathered regulators and industry leaders alike, all trying to figure out ways to coordinate more effectively, reduce compliance headaches, and bring some clarity to the rapidly evolving world of blockchain-based financial products. Both SEC Chair Paul Atkins and CFTC Acting Chair Caroline Pham made it clear they wanted to prioritize their respective regulatory missions over fighting over jurisdictional boundaries. This approach reflects guidance given earlier that summer by the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets. Interestingly enough, the conversations revealed differing views around exemptions and sandbox frameworks—where some larger, more established institutions advocated for tighter oversight, while newer market entrants supported more flexible, less restrictive rules. For example, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce openly discussed the messy overlaps in jurisdiction—particularly around prediction markets—highlighting ongoing debates about whether such markets should fall under the CFTC, state gaming regulators, or both. At the same time, the SEC granted no-action relief to DoubleZero, a DePIN project working on its “2Z” token. This was a significant move—the first of its kind since the SEC’s 2020 IMVU letter. Essentially, the relief allows the project to transfer tokens programmatically as part of providing network services, without classifying those transfers as securities transactions. But there’s an important catch: the token can't include features like dividends or deflationary mechanisms that passively build value for holders. This outcome involved tight collaboration between SEC staff and the project’s legal team, signaling a more engaged and flexible SEC attitude toward blockchain innovations. While the decision partly rests on a rationale related to the token’s consumptive use—something courts have historically tended to scrutinize suspiciously—it at least offers a clearer path forward for projects trying to distinguish utility tokens from securities. Honestly, it’s a promising step, even if the legal landscape remains complex. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats have also rolled out their own market structure framework, aiming to bolster the majority bill crafted by the Senate Banking Committee. They’ve scheduled a markup—probably late October or early November—which hints at the possibility of bipartisan support. It seems they’re mostly aligned with Republicans on many issues, which bodes well for legislative progress. That said, some deep disagreements still linger. These include questions about how federal law might pre-empt state regulations, the oversight of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, and restrictions on stablecoin yields that are passed on to consumers. The final Senate package is expected to look quite different from the House-passed CLARITY Act. Instead of moving quickly, the Senate Agriculture Committee—responsible for oversight of the CFTC—has yet to release its accompanying proposal. This adds a layer of delay to comprehensive reforms in the market structure arena. On the legislative front, the SEC moved swiftly to approve new rules that make it easier to list commodity-based ETFs, including those tied to cryptocurrencies. This is a big deal—it will significantly streamline the process for launching numerous pending crypto ETFs and could lead to a flood of new product offerings. Industry groups, including the Digital Chamber of Commerce, played an influential role by submitting supportive comments that helped push this through. Furthermore, the SEC granted approval for trading a fund holding multiple cryptocurrencies and even signaled openness to incorporating staking or liquid staking tokens—these were just moves to further embed crypto assets within traditional investment platforms. Beyond regulation and legislation, there’s a flurry of other activities worth noting. The Department of Treasury is pushing ahead with the implementation of the GENIUS Act, seeking public input on its framework. And then there’s the ongoing saga around leadership at the CFTC—after delays, the nomination of Brian Quintenz for a permanent chair has been officially withdrawn, leaving the agency without confirmed leadership or a quorum. This leadership gap raises concerns about the agency’s ability to maintain momentum on important initiatives, like exploring stablecoin collateral arrangements for derivatives trading. On the innovation side, the SEC’s Project Crypto—launched in August under Chair Atkins—is aimed at developing a regulatory framework for digital assets. The project seeks to create clearer guidelines for crypto tokens classified as securities, promoting lawful issuance, custody, and trading of crypto assets while deterring misconduct. SEC Chair Atkins has also emphasized the importance of enabling \u201csuper-app\u201d trading platforms that combine trading, lending, and staking under a single regulatory umbrella, aiming to make the regulatory landscape more adaptable to the fast-paced, multi-faceted nature of digital assets. Additionally, the SEC’s Crypto Task Force has stepped up efforts to engage with startups and smaller projects through nationwide roundtables, gathering feedback to help guide rulemaking priorities. The crypto market itself continues to show signs of strength. Companies like Gemini and Figure have successfully gone public, exceeding earnings expectations, and venture capital remains active—nine startups raised nearly $870 million in just one week. Overall, the sector is projected to attract about $25 billion in venture funding by year-end 2025, which is quite remarkable given the regulatory uncertainties. All in all, these developments paint a picture of a digital asset space in rapid flux. Agencies like the SEC and CFTC are pushing ahead with coordinated efforts that, despite some gaps, aim to bring more structure and clarity, while private companies keep innovating and expanding. The dynamic interplay between pragmatic regulatory signals, a still-leaderless CFTC, and Democratic proposals in the Senate makes this a critical juncture for U.S. crypto policy. Watchers will want to see how these moves influence the integration of digital assets into traditional markets and shape the regulatory landscape in the upcoming months. It’s a period of significant change and opportunity. Source: Noah Wire ServicesVerification / Sources https://natlawreview.com/article/blockchain-bi-weekly-cftcsec-move-forward-crypto-focused-initiatives-and-important - Please view link - unable to able to access data https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9115-25 - On September 5, 2025, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a joint statement announcing a roundtable on September 29 to discuss regulatory harmonisation efforts. The agencies aim to coordinate on enabling the trading of certain spot crypto asset products, aligning with recommendations from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets report. This initiative seeks to provide markets with the clarity they deserve and to make America the best place to innovate with blockchain technology and participate in crypto asset markets. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9105-25 - On August 4, 2025, CFTC Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham announced the launch of an initiative for trading spot crypto asset contracts listed on a CFTC-registered futures exchange. This initiative is part of the CFTC’s crypto sprint to implement recommendations from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets report. The goal is to enable immediate trading of digital assets at the federal level, in coordination with the SEC’s Project Crypto, to foster innovation in digital asset markets. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-101-sec-permits-kind-creations-redemptions-crypto-etps - On July 29, 2025, the SEC approved orders permitting in-kind creations and redemptions by authorised participants for crypto asset exchange-traded product (ETP) shares. This decision aligns with standard practices for similar ETPs and is expected to make these products less costly and more efficient for investors. SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins highlighted the agency's commitment to developing a fit-for-purpose regulatory framework for crypto asset markets. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9104-25 - On August 1, 2025, CFTC Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham announced the commencement of a crypto sprint to implement recommendations from the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets report. The initiative aims to enable immediate trading of digital assets at the federal level, in coordination with the SEC’s Project Crypto, to foster innovation in digital asset markets and make America the crypto capital of the world. https://www.sec.gov/about/sec-launches-project-crypto - On August 5, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins announced the launch of 'Project Crypto', an initiative aimed at developing a regulatory framework for digital assets. The project seeks to provide clear guidelines for crypto tokens classified as securities, promoting lawful issuance, custody, and trading of crypto assets while deterring misconduct. This move aligns with the SEC's commitment to establishing a firm foundation for digital asset regulation. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-102-road-sec-crypto-task-force-host-series-roundtables-across-us - On August 1, 2025, the SEC announced that its Crypto Task Force will host a series of roundtables across the United States to engage with stakeholders on digital asset regulation. The roundtables aim to gather input from representatives of crypto-related projects, particularly those with fewer than ten employees and less than two years old, to ensure comprehensive outreach and inform the development of a regulatory framework for digital assets. Noah Fact Check Pro The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first emerged. We've since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may warrant further investigation. Freshness check Score: 8 Notes: The narrative references recent events, including the SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero dated September 29, 2025, and the SEC-CFTC joint roundtable on regulatory harmonization held on September 29, 2025. These events are current and have been reported by reputable sources such as Axios and the SEC's official website. (axios.com) The inclusion of these recent developments suggests a high freshness score. Quotes check Score: 7 Notes: The narrative includes direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce regarding the SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero. These quotes are consistent with statements made by Commissioner Peirce on September 29, 2025. (sec.gov) The alignment of these quotes with the original source indicates a moderate to high originality score. Source reliability Score: 9 Notes: The narrative is published on the National Law Review, a reputable platform known for its legal analysis and commentary. The inclusion of direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and references to official SEC press releases further enhance the credibility of the information presented. (sec.gov) Plausability check Score: 8 Notes: The narrative presents developments that are consistent with recent regulatory actions and statements from the SEC and CFTC. The SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero and the SEC-CFTC joint roundtable on regulatory harmonization are plausible and align with the current regulatory landscape. (sec.gov) The inclusion of direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce adds authenticity to the narrative. Overall assessment Veredict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH Summary: The narrative effectively incorporates recent developments, including the SEC's no-action letter to DoubleZero and the SEC-CFTC joint roundtable on regulatory harmonization. The use of direct quotes from SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and references to official SEC press releases enhance the credibility and originality of the content. The alignment with current regulatory actions and statements further supports the plausibility of the information presented.

Isabel Schnabel highlights the importance of maintaining bank resilience through smarter regulation, deeper financial integration, and technological innovation to address new systemic risks in Europe’s evolving financial landscape.In her recent speech marking Klaas Knot’s farewell symposium, Isabel Schnabel, a member of the ECB’s Executive Board, emphasized just how vital it is to keep the resilience of banks intact—something that’s largely been built through reforms following the global financial crisis. Schnabel pointed out that even with a financial environment that’s changing pretty fast—think rising geopolitical tensions, skyrocketing asset values, and a flurry of innovations—banks still play a crucial role in financing the real economy and transmitting monetary policy across the euro area. She was quite clear in her warning against deregulation initiatives, especially given the strong nationalist and protectionist currents around. Instead, she called for regulatory reforms that can improve efficiency—making the system run more smoothly—without sweeping away the stability we've fought so hard to establish over the past decade and a half. And she also framed these efforts within a bigger picture: boosting European financial integration and sovereignty. You see, the 2008 global financial crisis left deep scars on the economy. It exposed how fragile banks could be if they didn’t have enough capital, and it showed how inadequate regulation could be. That chaos led to deep recessions, ballooning public debt, and sluggish growth for years. Schnabel explained how this threw into motion a set of reforms—like Basel III standards for capital and liquidity, macroprudential policies, resolution regimes, and the creation of the European banking union—that successfully made euro area banks more resilient. To give you an idea, their capital ratios have more than doubled since before the crisis, and liquidity buffers are now comfortably above the minimum required, even as the ECB scales back on providing liquidity. These stronger fundamentals meant banks could act as stabilizers during subsequent shocks, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the sudden jump in interest rates starting in 2022. Both crises proved that banks' capacity to absorb shocks without causing or worsening financial instability has improved—you know, helping to keep credit flowing to both companies and households. That said, Schnabel stressed that while banks are safer, the financial system isn’t the same as it was before—and it’s now faced with new risks that require a comprehensive approach. Non-bank financial institutions—what you might call shadow banks—have grown significantly and now hold assets that actually surpass those of traditional banks. This shift of credit towards sectors with less regulation has created complex interconnections between banks and these non-banks—through lending, funding, securities holdings, risk transfers, and so forth. ECB data shows that a small handful of systemically important banks are heavily involved with shadow banks, often via uninsured deposits that can evaporate quickly if there’s a sudden panic. Such linkages highlight why ECB President Christine Lagarde has been advocating for tighter regulation of shadow banks, which now hold assets roughly equal to about 350% of Europe’s GDP, in order to reduce systemic risks and make the playing field fairer. Adding to the mix, Schnabel talked about how stablecoins are emerging as new financial tools, creating bridges between traditional banking, cryptocurrency markets, and asset markets—interesting, right? Stablecoins can offer faster, cheaper cross-border payments that bypass the usual correspondent banking routes, which sounds promising. But they also carry risks similar to bank runs—mainly because they depend on demandable liabilities backed by reserves, which might become illiquid during times of stress. Deposits linked to stablecoins at euro area banks have grown faster after the EU introduced its Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) back in 2023, though they’re still a small slice of total assets. Schnabel warned that if stablecoin adoption keeps expanding, the risks—like sudden withdrawals, forced sales of Treasuries held as reserves, and the potential for market instability—could ripple out, affecting banks and the entire financial system. ECB research even shows that stablecoins respond quite differently to economic shocks than traditional money market funds, which underlines the need for regulation that addresses these fresh vulnerabilities—without stifling what could be beneficial innovation. Against this backdrop, Schnabel was quite firm in her stance against deregulating banks. She referenced ECB research indicating that higher capital buffers actually boost resilience and also improve profitability, which counters the argument that regulation hurts European banks’ competitiveness. Thanks to rising interest rates, banks in the euro area have seen profits grow and are closing the valuation gap with their US counterparts. Rather than pulling back regulatory frameworks, Schnabel suggested focusing on making things more efficient—by reducing complexity, fixing overlaps, and harmonizing reporting standards across countries. One example is the ECB’s “next-level supervision” initiative, which aims to streamline supervisory processes, including reforming the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP), and projects like the Integrated Reporting Framework (IReF), which seeks to automate and unify bank reporting. Further improvements, Schnabel argued, rely on advancing financial integration within Europe—especially finalizing the banking union. Fragmentation persists because of different national regulation, the lack of a European deposit insurance scheme, political resistance to cross-border bank mergers, and gaps in resolution mechanisms. An integrated capital market could help provide better funding, foster innovation, and encourage risk-sharing, all of which would bolster the resilience of banks and the broader economy. Lastly, Schnabel underscored how critical it is for Europe to embrace technological innovation to strengthen its financial sovereignty. She pointed to initiatives like the digital euro and exploring distributed ledger technology for wholesale transactions—these could really help elevate the euro’s status internationally, all while keeping banks at the center of Europe’s payment systems. In summary, Schnabel’s message was clear: the stability we’ve achieved through post-crisis regulation has been vital in protecting the euro area from major shocks and supporting economic recovery. Instead of relaxing standards, governments and policymakers should focus on addressing emerging risks from shadow banks and digital innovations — through regulation that’s appropriate and forward-looking. The long-term benefits of maintaining a stable financial system clearly outweigh any short-term gains that might come from deregulation. With euro area banks currently solid and profitable, the key now is to keep boosting resilience and efficiency through smarter regulation, deeper integration, and greater sovereignty—so that Europe’s economy and its banking sector are well equipped to serve the future. Source: Noah Wire ServicesVerification / Sources https://www.ecb.europa.eu//press/key/date/2025/html/ecb.sp251003_1~edb1443d00.en.html - Please view link - unable to able to access data https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2025/html/ecb.sp251003_1~edb1443d00.en.html - In her speech at the farewell symposium for Klaas Knot, Isabel Schnabel, Member of the ECB's Executive Board, emphasised the importance of maintaining the resilience of banks through post-crisis reforms. She highlighted that, despite evolving financial landscapes, banks continue to play a central role in financing the real economy and transmitting monetary policy in the euro area. Schnabel cautioned against deregulation, advocating instead for enhancing the efficiency of existing regulations to strengthen the broader financial system and promote European integration and sovereignty. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/europe-needs-tighter-regulation-shadow-banks-lagarde-says-2025-10-03/ - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde called for stricter regulation of non-bank financial institutions, often referred to as 'shadow banks', due to their rapid growth and lighter oversight compared to traditional banks. Lagarde noted that these entities now hold assets equivalent to about 350% of Europe’s GDP and urged policymakers to raise regulatory standards for non-banks engaged in bank-like activities to mitigate systemic risks and address competitive imbalances with traditional banks. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/bank-englands-bailey-warns-against-rolling-back-financial-regulation-2025-10-03/ - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey cautioned against easing financial regulations, warning that doing so could reintroduce risks as the memory of past financial crises fades. Speaking at an event hosted by the Dutch central bank, Bailey emphasised the importance of continuing to collect crucial data, especially in emerging areas of risk, and disagreed with the notion that post-2008 financial regulations were responsible for Britain’s underwhelming investment and productivity performance. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/ecb-says-eu-going-too-far-easing-bank-securitisation-rules-2025-09-30/ - The European Central Bank (ECB) expressed concerns over the European Commission's recent proposals to ease banking securitisation rules. ECB supervisor Pedro Machado criticised the reforms, especially those related to complex and synthetic securitisations, for potentially heightening financial risks. The Commission's proposals aim to stimulate lending and enhance Europe's financial competitiveness but the ECB warns that such changes could reintroduce 'agency and model risks' and promote opaque and riskier structures. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/basel-chair-urges-banks-fully-implement-capital-rules-soon-possible-2024-04-18/ - Pablo Hernández de Cos, Chair of the Basel Committee, urged banks to fully implement international capital rules known as Basel III 'as soon as possible' to ensure financial stability. The Basel Committee faces resistance from U.S. banks in the final phase of post-crisis capital reforms designed to prevent taxpayer-funded bailouts. De Cos highlighted the importance of common regulatory and supervisory standards for global financial stability, especially in light of recent banking crises. https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/yellen-call-more-financial-stability-work-thoughtful-regulation-2024-09-26/ - U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen emphasised the need for continuous efforts to ensure a resilient financial system through thoughtful regulations at a Treasury markets conference in New York. Highlighting the reforms after the 2007-2009 financial crisis, Yellen noted their role in navigating recent challenges, including the pandemic and regional bank issues, and stressed that maintaining financial stability requires persistent regulatory measures against those advocating for easing bank capital requirements. Noah Fact Check Pro The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first emerged. We've since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may warrant further investigation. Freshness check Score: 10 Notes: The narrative is based on a press release from the European Central Bank (ECB), dated 3 October 2025, marking Klaas Knot's farewell symposium. As a press release, this typically warrants a high freshness score. No earlier versions of this content were found, indicating originality. The content has not been republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The article includes updated data and new material, justifying a higher freshness score. (ecb.europa.eu) Quotes check Score: 10 Notes: The quotes in the narrative are unique to this press release. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating originality. No variations in quote wording were found. Source reliability Score: 10 Notes: The narrative originates from the European Central Bank (ECB), a reputable organisation. This enhances the credibility of the content. Plausability check Score: 10 Notes: The claims made in the narrative are plausible and consistent with known information. The content is detailed and specific, with factual anchors such as names, institutions, and dates. The language and tone are consistent with official ECB communications. No excessive or off-topic details unrelated to the claim were identified. The tone is formal and appropriate for the context. Overall assessment Veredict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH Summary: The narrative is a recent, original press release from the ECB, containing unique quotes and originating from a reputable source. The claims are plausible, detailed, and consistent with official ECB communications, with no signs of disinformation.

At an event in Amsterdam, a senior central banker highlighted the critical role of early oversight and strengthened regulation in managing the delicate balance between monetary policy and financial stability, especially with rising systemic risks from non-bank institutions.At a recent event in Amsterdam, a senior figure from the central banking community paid tribute to Klaas Knot, the former President of De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) and Chair of the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The speaker emphasized Knot's vital role in shaping monetary policy and fostering financial stability across national, European, and global stages. His leadership during significant challenges—from the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic to today’s inflationary surge—illustrates the intricate balance central banks must maintain between monetary policy and financial stability. The speech underscored that the interaction between sustaining stable prices and maintaining a resilient financial system is continuous. Policies aimed at curbing inflation, such as interest rate hikes, can exert stress on banks and threaten systemic stability. For example, rapid tightening of monetary policy in the 1980s by the Federal Reserve to reduce high inflation contributed to the savings and loan crisis, compounded by deregulation that fostered riskier lending practices and weaker oversight. Conversely, prolonged periods of low interest rates and regulatory laxity—like those in recent years—can incentivize excessive borrowing and risk-taking, potentially leading to vulnerabilities that may eventually trigger crises, as seen in 2008. The 2008 financial crisis was primarily driven by rampant speculation in the U.S. housing market and a weak regulatory environment. The proliferation of subprime mortgages and complex securitization, coupled with insufficient oversight, led to enormous losses for financial institutions and the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. This event triggered a severe global recession, with widespread unemployment and business failures. In response, countries introduced sweeping regulatory reforms, including the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and Basel III internationally, designed to strengthen banks through higher capital requirements, better risk management, and increased transparency—measures that highlighted the necessity of robust oversight to prevent such failures. Following these reforms, the financial system experienced a shift in how the tension between monetary policy and financial stability is managed. During the subsequent years, especially after the global financial crisis, central banks employed unconventional tools like large-scale asset purchases and negative interest rates to combat persistent low inflation. Despite initial concerns, these measures, supported by strengthened regulatory frameworks—such as the macroprudential policies in the Netherlands under Knot’s leadership—helped ward off excessive leverage and financial exuberance. DNB, for instance, introduced higher capital buffers and stricter risk weights to mitigate housing market risks and contain vulnerabilities. Later, when inflation surged again—peaking at just above 17% in September 2022 in the euro area, with the Netherlands experiencing rapid increases—the ECB responded with rapid monetary tightening—raising interest rates ten times cumulatively by 450 basis points, the fastest in its history. Despite fears that such swift moves could destabilize markets or strain borrowers, the system remained resilient due to stronger capital positions, ample liquidity, and proactive supervision, including the ECB's early assessments of interest rate risks by the Single Supervisory Mechanism. This resilience allowed monetary policy to focus on price stability without causing broad financial instability. Looking forward, significant structural changes in the financial landscape pose new challenges. Among these, the expansion of non-bank financial institutions (such as investment funds, insurers, and securitization vehicles) has been notable; their assets in the euro area now exceed 350% of GDP. Banks also hold sizeable exposures to these non-banks, averaging around one-tenth of significant institutions’ total assets, indicating a complex interconnectedness that warrants close attention. A concern is regulatory fatigue—where complacency or slowing momentum in tightening oversight could overlook emerging risks—especially since non-banks often operate under lighter regulation despite their growing systemic importance. In response, policymakers—including Knot as FSB Chair—advocate for “levelling up” regulation. The aim is to extend strong oversight to non-bank entities involved in bank-like activities or with significant links to banks, thus ensuring potential vulnerabilities are addressed early. Such measures would provide a clearer picture of systemic risks and help prevent crises. This push for comprehensive regulation is complemented by efforts like the ECB High-Level Task Force on Simplification, which strives to reduce unnecessary complexity in regulatory frameworks without compromising resilience—making oversight more effective and efficient. In conclusion, the timeless proverb from Dutch humanist Erasmus, “Prevention is better than cure,” resonates strongly today. Vigilance and proactive regulation are essential in safeguarding financial stability. As the financial system evolves, particularly with increasing interconnectedness and the rise of non-banks, regulators and supervisors must remain alert. Waiting for another crisis to underscore the importance of oversight would be a costly mistake. Instead, policymakers must prioritize extending and strengthening regulation now—before vulnerabilities fully materialize—as history clearly demonstrates that early action is significantly less costly than crisis management after the fact. Source: Noah Wire ServicesVerification / Sources https://mondovisione.com/media-and-resources/news/monetary-policy-and-financial-stability-past-lessons-for-future-resilience-ke-2025103/ - Please view link - unable to able to access data https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_financial_crisis - The 2008 financial crisis, also known as the global financial crisis (GFC), was a major worldwide economic downturn that began in the United States. It was triggered by excessive speculation on property values, leading to the 2000s housing bubble. This was exacerbated by predatory lending for subprime mortgages and deficiencies in regulation. The crisis resulted in the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, triggering a stock market crash and bank runs in several countries. The global economy experienced a severe recession, with millions becoming unemployed and many businesses going bankrupt. Governments worldwide intervened with stimulus packages and other measures to stabilize the financial system and support the economy. The crisis led to significant changes in the financial industry and regulatory landscape, including the implementation of new regulations to improve the supervision and regulation of the financial industry, such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the United States and Basel III internationally. It also highlighted the importance of transparency and accountability in financial systems, as many financial institutions engaged in risky behavior without properly disclosing their activities, contributing to the crisis. The crisis underscored the risks of relying on financial models that don't account for rare events, demonstrating the need for stronger financial regulations and improved risk management practices. https://www.stlouisfed.org/dialogue-with-the-fed/lessons-learned-from-the-financial-crisis - This article discusses the origins of the 2008 financial crisis, focusing on the housing bubble and its causes, including the growth of private-label mortgage securitization, increased subprime mortgage lending, and homeowners using their homes as mechanisms for generating cash. As housing prices began to fall, financial market panic started in September 2008. The Federal Reserve provided liquidity to stem the panic and prevent an economic collapse, along with actions taken by the U.S. government and the FDIC. Despite these interventions, the Great Recession ensued, with lingering problems such as housing market weakness and high national unemployment rates. The article concludes with three main lessons learned from the crisis: the dangers of high levels of debt and the expectation that housing prices will always increase; the need for understanding risk across all parts of the financial system, as spreading risk outside the insured banking system did not result in risk diversification; and the importance of considering long-term consequences of short-term policy choices, as highlighted by the Dodd-Frank Act. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_mortgage_crisis - The American subprime mortgage crisis was a multinational financial crisis that occurred between 2007 and 2010, contributing to the 2008 financial crisis. It led to a severe economic recession, with millions becoming unemployed and many businesses going bankrupt. The U.S. government intervened with a series of measures to stabilize the financial system, including the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The collapse of the United States housing bubble and high interest rates led to unprecedented numbers of borrowers missing mortgage repayments and becoming delinquent. This ultimately led to mass foreclosures and the devaluation of housing-related securities. The housing bubble preceding the crisis was financed with mortgage-backed securities (MBSes) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), which initially offered higher interest rates than government securities, along with attractive risk ratings from rating agencies. Estimates of impact have continued to climb. During April 2008, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimated that global losses for financial institutions would approach $1 trillion. One year later, the IMF estimated cumulative losses of banks and other financial institutions globally would exceed $4 trillion. The crisis led to significant financial sector regulatory changes, including the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act in the United States and Basel III internationally. https://www.alphastockdata.com/Articles/Details/1187 - This article examines the systemic causes and policy blunders that led to the 2008 financial crisis. It highlights the role of deregulation, particularly the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, which allowed financial institutions to engage in riskier investment activities using depositor funds, significantly increasing systemic risk. The article also discusses the loosening of regulations under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which permitted banks, insurers, and investment firms to merge and expand rapidly, blurring lines of oversight and accountability. This wave of deregulation created an environment where financial institutions could undertake excessive risks without sufficient regulatory oversight. The article emphasizes the need for stricter capital requirements, improved oversight of complex financial instruments, and a renewed focus on transparency to build a more resilient financial framework. https://themba.institute/risk-management-in-banks/global-financial-crisis-2008/ - This article provides an overview of the 2008 financial crisis, detailing its causes, effects, and the lessons learned. It discusses the role of government intervention, including massive stimulus packages and other measures to stabilize the financial system and support the economy. The article also highlights the need for stronger financial regulations, improved risk management practices, and enhanced consumer protection. It emphasizes the importance of international cooperation among regulators and policymakers to address global financial stability and systemic risks. The crisis led to significant changes in the financial industry and regulatory landscape, including the implementation of new regulations to improve the supervision and regulation of the financial industry, such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the United States and Basel III internationally. https://kingcenter.stanford.edu/publications/working-paper/global-financial-crisis-causes-impact-policy-responses-and-lessons - This working paper examines the causes, impact, policy responses, and lessons learned from the global financial crisis. It traces the crisis back to excessively loose monetary policy in the U.S. during 2002-04, which led to low interest rates and large global imbalances. Coupled with lax lending standards, excessive leverage, and underpricing of risk, the crisis quickly spread to global financial markets. The paper discusses India's experience during the crisis, noting that despite limited exposure to toxic assets, India faced capital outflows following the Lehman failure, requiring urgent fiscal and monetary policy responses. The paper concludes by considering India's preemptive policy approach to large volatility in capital flows and imbalances, and in financial regulation, as a lesson for maintaining financial stability. Noah Fact Check Pro The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first emerged. We've since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may warrant further investigation. Freshness check Score: 10 Notes: The narrative is based on a recent speech by Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank, delivered on 3 October 2025 at the farewell symposium for Klaas Knot, President of De Nederlandsche Bank. This event is current and directly relevant to the ongoing discussions on monetary policy and financial stability. Quotes check Score: 10 Notes: The speech includes direct quotes from Klaas Knot, such as his reminder to colleagues to be more "impactful" in their interventions. These quotes are unique to this event and have not been found in earlier publications. Source reliability Score: 10 Notes: The narrative originates from a reputable source, Mondo Visione, which provides financial markets intelligence. The event was attended by high-profile figures, including the President of the European Central Bank, lending credibility to the content. Plausability check Score: 10 Notes: The claims made in the narrative align with known events and the professional backgrounds of the individuals involved. The discussion on the interaction between monetary policy and financial stability is consistent with ongoing economic discourse. Overall assessment Veredict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH Summary: The narrative is based on a recent and original speech by Christine Lagarde, featuring unique quotes and sourced from a reputable outlet. The content is current, aligns with known events, and presents plausible claims, warranting a high confidence in its credibility.